© 2000 John Petroff 

C- Classification of major types of ratios

 

1)- Common size analysis:

In common size financial statements (also known as normalized financial statements), each item in a financial statement is reduced to a percentage of the total which is gross sales in the income statement and total assets in the balance sheet. This makes comparison between firms of different size possible. Comparison of financial statements distorted by the effects of inflation is also somewhat improved. Table T-5.1 presents Texaco normalized balance sheet, and Table T-5.2 presents AO BOOM normalized balance sheet below.

Table T-5.1

Texaco Inc. and Subsidiary Companies

Normalized Balance Sheets
. 1989 1990
Assets % %
Cash 8.40 2.70
Short-term investments 0.70 0.50
Accounts receivable 15.50 18.90
Inventories 5.30 5.30
Other current assets 0.40 0.50
Total current assets 30.30 25.90
Investments and Advances 14.00 15.00
Fixed Assets 51.40 55.00
Deferred charges 4.30 2.10
Total Assets 100 100
Liabilities

%

%
Notes payable 5.00 5.80
Trade payable 13.90 16.70
Tax payable 5.90 4.30
Other current liabilities - -
Total current liabilities 24.80 26.80
Long-term debt 16.70 15.90
Deferred taxes 5.90 6.90
Others 14.90 16.40
Equity 35.80 36.00
Total liabilities 100.00 100.00

 

Table T-5.2

Retail store "AO BOOM", Russia

Normalized Balance Sheet
. 1989 1990
Assets % %
Cash 35 23
Accounts receivable 1 1
Inventory 52 66
Other current assets 8 8
Total current assets 96 98
Fixed assets 3.7 1.2
Intangible 0.1 0.2
Other 0.2 0.6
Total assets 100 100
Liabilities % %
Notes payable 51 60
Current portion of LTD - -
Trade payable 1 2
Tax payable 1 1
Other current liabilities 7 2
Total current liabilities 60 65
Long term debt 6 0.5
Deferred taxes - -
Other - -
Equity 34 34.5
Total 100 100

 

The two companies presented above are radically different (in terms of size, industry, growth, and country of location), yet their balance sheets can be compared in many ways (e.g. liquidity, equity, debt). For instance, the proportion of equity in total funding is very similar (35% for Texaco and 34% for AO Boom), but the proportion of long term debt is not the same at all (16% for Texaco and 6% of less for AO Boom).

Less disparate but still belonging to different industries, one can see that balance sheets of the companies below have more in common:

Table T-5.4 - The Timken Company - Normalized Balance Sheets 1998-99
Table T-5.6 - Merck & Co., Inc - Normalized Balance Sheet 1997-98
Table T-5.8 - Bell Atlantic Corporation - Normalized Balance Sheets
Table T-5.10 - Lucent Technology - Normalized Balance Sheets
Table T-5.12 - J.C. Penney Company Inc. - Normalized Income Statement
Table T-5.14 - Delta Air Lines - Normalized Balance Sheets
 
Likewise their income statements listed below can also be compared, although their sales strategies and expense structures are different.
 
Table T-5.3  - The Timken Company -  Normalized Income Statements 1998-99
Table T-5.5 - Merck & Co., Inc. - Normalized Income Statement
Table T-5.7 - Bell Atlantic Corporation - Normalized Income Statement
Table T-5.9 - Lucent Technology - Normalized Income Statement
Table T-5.11 - J.C. Penney Company Inc. - Normalized Income Statement
Table T-5.13 - Delta Air Lines - Normalized Income Statement
 
It is true that the actual raw data for these companies has been entered into a uniform spreadsheet which produced the normalized data automatically. To make this possible some items had to be combined, such as different types of miscellaneous current assets. This is a common practice when analysis of a large number of different companies is necessary, but when only companies of a given industries are present, the structure of their financial statements should normally already be very similar.
 
 
Tables T-5.3 through T-5.13, as well as the data used to produce them, will be used repeatedly throughout the remainder of this text.
 
See review questions Q-5C1.1 and Q-5C1.2.

2)- Growth index analysis:

In growth index analysis (also known as index-number trend series), the rate of change for each individual item of consecutive financial statements is calculated and is presented either as a percent change, or as an index (with base 100 assigned to either the first year or the current year). The presentation reveals if some of the items are out of line in comparison to others. Table T-9.3 (which will be used in Chapter 9) presents the growth index income statement of Merck & Co., Inc. below.

Table T-9.3

Merck & Co., Inc.

Growth Index Income Statement
. 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988
Sales 453 398 334 281 252 177 163 145 129 110 100
Cost of Goods Sold 913 773 611 489 391 164 137 127 117 102 100
Gross Profit 294 268 238 209 204 181 171 151 134 113 100
Operating Expenses 289 235 209 182 173 160 160 140 127 108 100
Operating Profit 300 315 278 246 247 210 187 167 142 120 100
Interest - - - - - - - - - - -
Other 36171 8500 5129 2871 -2629 -11586 1029 829 686 657 100
Profit before tax 434 345 296 256 236 166 190 169 144 122 100
Tax 434 278 250 220 214 141 168 157 138 119 100
Profit after tax 434 382 321 276 248 179 203 176 147 124 100

 One can verify how the index for sales growth was calculated. For instance, the growth index for 1989 of 110 was obtained from sales for 1989 of $ 6,551 millions divided by the base year sales for 1988 of $ 5,940 millions shown in Table T-5.15. Thus

6,551 / 5,940 = 110

The growth index income statement is used to determine how fast different items are growing, and especially highlight items that grew exceptionally fast or not at all. In the case of Merck, it appears that costs of goods sold is growing much faster than sales. Such observation would deserve serious investigation by an analyst.

A growth index balance sheet is used in exactly the same fashion. However, finding data for several years in annual reports is less common for balance sheet than for income statement.

See review questions Q-5C2.1 and Q-5C2.2.

3)- Constructing ratios:

Ratios relate any two items of financial statements. A large number of ratios can be calculated. For instance, at Manufacturers Hanover Trust in 1995, 142 ratios were calculated for each firm analyzed. In constructing ratios one should combine
- matching components: for instance accounts payable matched with purchases would make sense, but not with income from marketable securities;
- same units: inventories are stated in the same units as cost of goods sold, but not sales;
- items with a meaningful functional relationship for the purpose at hand: return on equity may have a meaning to outsiders, but from a performance point of view one ought to look at such measures of profitability as profit margin earned from sales or return on assets, not return on equity.

See review question Q-5C3.1.

4)- Major groups of ratios:

Ratios will be defined and extensively put to use in the coming chapters. They are usually grouped by purpose of inquiry. There are about eight major groups:

- liquidity
- turnover
- asset structure
- capital structure
- gross margin
- profitability
- return on assets or equity
- coverage ratios

One can look up how spreadsheet derivation of ratios produce the sets of ratios for the companies used as examples in this manual:

Table T-5.16 - The Timken Company - Ratios
Table T-5.17 - Merck & Co., Inc - Ratios
Table T-5.18 - Bell Atlantic Corporation - Ratios
Table T-5.19 - Lucent Technology - Ratios
Table T-5.20 - J.C. Penney Company Inc. - Ratios
Table T-5.21 - Delta Air Lines - Ratios
Table T-5.22 - The Dow Company - Ratios
 

See research assignment R-5.2.

 Previous: Methods

Last modified: Jun/01/01
 Next: Ratio meaning