© 2000 John Petroff 

7)- Interest

Interest expense was analyzed in the previous chapter from the stand point of determining if the firm will be able to borrow in the future. Here the concern is whether the interest expense is in line with management strategy. If for instance, an expansion is planned, this means that new financing is needed, and as outlined in the previous chapter, the financing can be from debt (or preferred stock) at first. Since inventory and asset expansion precede sales, interest increase must also precede sales. If interest expense decreases instead, one must look for an explanation (may be preferred stock was issued); and if no explanation is apparent, then the inability or unwillingness on the part of management to use financial leverage must be questioned.

Let us take Midway Airlines to illustrate the analysis of interest expense. Table T-13.10 presents Midway's income statements and RMA statistics for the air carrier industry.

Table T-13.10

Midway Airlines Income Statements
. 1998 %  RMA 1997 % 1996 %
Revenues (in $ millions) 211 100.0 100.0  186 100 180 100
Salaries 32 15.2   26 14 25 14
Fuel 20 9.5   22 12 27 15
Aircraft rentals 30 14.2   30 16 34 19
Commissions 15 7.1   14 8 14 8
Maintenance 16 7.6   16 9 18 10
Fees 10 4.7   10 5 13 7
Depreciation 6 2.8   2 1 1 1
Other 56 26.5   51 27 71 39
Operating expenses 185 87.7 94.5  171 92 203 113
Operating income 26 12.3 5.5  15 8 -23 -13
Interest income 4 1.9   2 1 1 1
Interest expense -6 -2.8 1.1  -2 -1 -2 -1
Profit before tax 24 11.4 4.4  15 8 -24 -13
Source: Midway Airlines Corporation 1998 Annual Report

We see in the table that interest expense almost tripled in 1998 to 2.8% of revenues, from 1% it was the year before. In his message to shareholders, Midway's chairman tells about adding eight aircrafts to the fleet (an increase of 62%) and hiring 150 employees (an increase of 19%). It is clear that to finance such a large expansion new funds are needed. Note #3 to financial statements indicates that long term debt has been restructured, with a $34 millions variable rate note refinanced with a fixed rate 6.9% secured note of the same amount, and a new note of $34 millions issued in 1998, thus doubling long term debt. To make this additional borrowing possible, note #1 states that the corporation has gone through a quasi-reorganization whereby accumulated deficits of $51 millions were reclassified as a reduction of paid-in capital, and new shares were issued.

These events explain why the previously noted low salaries were tolerated by the employees in light of prior years losses and potential bankruptcy. But the bold steps undertaken in 1998 give the airline a brighter future even if interest expense is out of line with RMA of only 1.1%. Note however, that RMA's statistic and consequently this analysis omit implied interest of operating lease (see Chapter 11).

See review question Q-13C7.1.

 Previous: 6-R&D

Last modified: Jun/01/01
 Next: 8-Taxes