|
|
© 2000 John Petroff |
To grow companies need capital. Some capital can be generated internally as retained earnings belonging to shareholders if the company has profits and does not distribute them all. The rest must be raised in capital markets or borrowed. Decisions as to what type of capital to seek will be studied in next chapter. Here we raise the issues of what proportions of debt and equity companies should use. And whether companies ought to use debt at all. We answer affirmatively but with a number of limitations. Aggregate fund flows in the United States show that roughly half is equity and half debt, but that includes individuals, financial institutions and governmental agencies. The average proportion for American nonfinancial businesses is actually one third equity and two thirds debt. At a first glance, it seems that 34% or 50% are pretty close and are reasonable proportions all firms could accept. In reality, nothing inspires more divergence of view than what proportion of capital firms ought to have.
Whereas, there is close to general consensus among all points of view on sales, profits, liquidity and even asset breakdown. This is not the case when it comes to the question of whether either equity or debt is more desirable. Each lender prefers to see as little debt as possible. Each shareholder may prefer the firm to use as much leverage as possible, but that is debatable. Management fears borrowing, but can't achieve its goals without it. The sections in this chapter reflect this duality of debt positive and negative aspects. The following sections are covered:
See review questions Q-11.1 through Q-11.3.
| Previous: Fixed Assets Comments |
|
Next: Interpretation |